Personal Injury Lawsuits: What They Are and How They Work

Personal Injury Lawsuits Injury Law

Personal Injury Lawsuits: What They Are and How They Work

A personal injury lawsuit is simply a legal action, brought in court, by someone who has been injured (either physically or emotionally) by another person, usually by way of an accident, fall, or product malfunction. There are many phases to a personal injury lawsuit, and it’s often difficult to predict how long it will take to resolve a case. This article will take you through each phase of a typical personal injury lawsuit.

The Accident

Contacting an Attorney

Demand Letter

Filing a Lawsuit

Discovery

Pre-trial Motions

Settlement

Trial

Appeal

Collection

The Accident

When an accident occurs, it is important to record as much data as you can about the circumstances surrounding the accident as quickly as you can. For example, if you are involved in a car accident, you might want to call the police to have them make a report about the scene, such as the position of cars, skid marks, and so on. If possible you should have someone take photos or videos of the scene of the accident as soon as possible after the accident. You might record a torn carpet, damaged step, or spilled food that has caused a fall or skid marks and broken glass from a car accident. You will also want to get the names and contact information of any witnesses to the accident. Anyone who is injured in an accident should seek medical care as soon as possible to find out what injuries have been caused by the accident and to minimize injury. Documenting these details early on will help you determine key issues, such as fault and amount of damages, when the time comes. It will also keep you from forgetting important details.

Contacting an Attorney

Unless your injuries were very minor (i.e. very minor soft tissue injury from a 5 MPH fender bender), you should consult with an attorney very soon after your accident. A good personal injury attorney can help you gather key evidence and provide valuable advice on how to document your injuries and damages. Under no circumstances should you talk to an attorney representing the other person in the accident, the other person’s insurance company representative, or sign any documents, before consulting with your own attorney first.

Demand Letter

If you believe you’re entitled to compensation from the other party for your injuries, your attorney will usually send a demand letter, either to the other person (or their attorney) or to the other person’s insurance company. The letter will give the relevant facts about the accident such as the time and place and cause of the injury, describe your injury, and ask for a specified amount in settlement of the case. A demand letter usually gives the other parties a specified time to respond.

Filing a Lawsuit

If your case is not settled, the next step is for the person who has been injured to file a lawsuit. The person filing the suit is called the plaintiff, and the document the plaintiff files is usually called a complaint. The party being sued is called the defendant. A third party serves the complaint on each of the defendants, and the defendants have a specified time to reply to it, such as 20 to 30 days. This reply is usually called an answer. All documents, including the complaint and the answer, are filed with a local court. The plaintiff usually chooses the court, although, under certain circumstances, a defendant may seek to have the lawsuit moved to a different court.

Discovery

After the lawsuit has been filed, the parties have an opportunity to get information from each other about the case. This can be in the form of written questions, sworn testimony in front of a court reporter, and requests for documents and things. For example, a plaintiff who was injured tripping on a step may want to find out if other people had tripped on the same step before the accident. This information would be used to show that the owner knew the step was dangerous and should have foreseen that someone might be injured in a fall (a necessary element to prove negligence on the part of the owner). On the other hand, the owner might want to find out if the plaintiff had been injured before to argue that the injury claimed was not caused by the fall on the steps.

Pre-trial Motions

Before the case is set for trial, the attorneys in the case may make various legal arguments about the case in the form of motions to the court. These might concern the adequacy of the complaint or answer, disputes about discovery, or an argument that one party’s case is so strong that he or she is entitled to judgment in his or her favor without a trial.

Settlement

When the case is finally ready for trial, many courts require the attorneys to meet with a judge for a settlement conference where the judge tries to help the parties reach a settlement agreement before going to trial. In some places the parties are referred to mediation before a case can be set for trial. In mediation the parties themselves might be present and the session is directed by a mediator instead of a judge.

Trial

If all efforts at settlement fail, the case will be set for trial before a judge or jury-whichever the plaintiff chooses. The parties will present witnesses, cross-examine the other parties’ witnesses, present evidence, and make arguments. At the end, the finder of fact (judge or jury) will enter a verdict for the plaintiff or defendant. If the verdict is for the plaintiff, the finder of fact will decide on the amount of damages.

Arbitration is an alternative to the trial process. Arbitration is similar to a trial, but is conducted before an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators. In binding arbitration the decision of the arbitrator or panel is as final as the trial court’s verdict. Parties to a lawsuit can agree to enter arbitration and are required to submit to arbitration in some contracts. For example, if you sign a contract with a health care provider that has an arbitration clause, if that person injures you, you may be bound by the agreement to use arbitration. Arbitration is usually less expensive than litigation and may be quicker.

Appeal

Either party can appeal if there was a significant legal error in the trial. To “appeal” means you take the case to a higher court to review any legal errors you think may have been made by the judge or jury. For example, a plaintiff might appeal if he thinks he lost his suit unfairly or would have gotten more in damages if the judge had not refused to admit something into evidence. A defendant might appeal if, for example, she thinks there is a valid legal basis to argue that the award for damages given to the plaintiff was too large.

Collection

When the lawsuit is finished, when an appeal is completed or a verdict entered that isn’t appealed, the plaintiff still has to collect the damages that have been awarded from the defendant. Some defendants are unable to pay damages, and plaintiffs usually name more than one defendant if possible to make sure they are able to collect enough to cover their damages and litigation costs. For example, a teenager driving a pizza delivery car probably won’t have enough personal assets to cover damages from a serious car accident. In that case, the plaintiff may collect from the employer or the employer’s insurance company.

If defendants don’t pay the damages awarded by the court, states have procedures similar to the discovery process that allow the plaintiff to find out where the defendant’s assets are and to collect as much of the damages as possible.

Do you need an experienced personal injury attorney?

There are times when an accident attorney is not needed. This is usually the case when the injuries are very minor and there are no disagreements about who was at fault and who should pay (and what amount should be paid). Often, however, things are not so simple. If you were involved in a more serious accident, you should contact a personal injury lawyer right away. See How a Personal Injury Lawyer Can Help for more information about what personal injury attorneys do and how they can help you you’re your case. If you are looking for a personal injury lawyer, you can find listings of qualified attorneys in your area by going to AttorneyPages.com. If you would like to have your case reviewed by an experienced personal injury lawyer, simply fill out our case evaluation form and an attorney will contact you for a no-cost, no obligation evaluation.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Personal Injury Lawsuits: What They Are and How They Work”

My wife had Paxil prescribed for her but decided to quit taking it without talking to her doctor. She suffered terrible withdrawal symptoms, including intense dizziness and vertigo which caused her to fall down a flight of stairs and seriously injure herself. How can we prove that the drug caused her dizzy spells? Will our damages be reduced because she decided on her own to stop taking the drug?

Paxil Withdrawl Symptoms Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

My wife had Paxil prescribed for her but decided to quit taking it without talking to her doctor. She suffered terrible withdrawal symptoms, including intense dizziness and vertigo which caused her to fall down a flight of stairs and seriously injure herself. How can we prove that the drug caused her dizzy spells? Will our damages be reduced because she decided on her own to stop taking the drug?

Paxil has been found to cause severe withdrawal symptoms in a number of people. These symptoms can include dizziness and vertigo which, if left untreated, can lead to the type of spells that caused your wife’s accident. GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of Paxil, was apparently aware of these symptoms but did not specifically warn doctors about them until Paxil had been on the market for nine years. Therefore, you may have a case against the manufacturer of Paxil, depending on when your wife began taking the Paxil.

You may also have a case against your wife’s doctor. If she began taking Paxil after the increased warnings were put into effect, GlaxoSmithKline may argue that it was up to your wife’s doctor to tell her about the severe withdrawal symptoms. If your wife’s doctor did not talk about these symptoms, your wife may be able to successfully sue him or her for malpractice.

Your wife’s doctor may argue that she brought the severe withdrawal symptoms on herself by discontinuing the drug without talking it over with the doctor first or without coming up with an actual withdrawal plan. The severity of the symptoms may have been controlled if your wife’s doctor had been involved, and your wife’s doctor may also have been able to monitor her withdrawal to help her compensate for or overcome any symptoms. Therefore, the fact that she stopped taking the drug without talking to her doctor first may reduce her damage award. How much depends on where your case is located. Your attorney will be able to work with you to develop a strategy to deal with this.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “My wife had Paxil prescribed for her but decided to quit taking it without talking to her doctor. She suffered terrible withdrawal symptoms, including intense dizziness and vertigo which caused her to fall down a flight of stairs and seriously injure herself. How can we prove that the drug caused her dizzy spells? Will our damages be reduced because she decided on her own to stop taking the drug?”

What is ‘comparative negligence’?

Comparative Negligences Injury Law

What is ‘comparative negligence’?

Comparative negligence comes into play when it is contended that two or more parties failed to perform at the standard of the “ordinary reasonable person”. For example, suppose one person was driving too fast in a patch of dense fog on the highway and hit a car — but the car that was hit did not have its lights on as it should have.

In a situation where each party has some degree of negligence in causing an accident, the responsibility to the other person(s) is reduced by the others’ degree of negligence. For example suppose a jury decides that the driver going too fast in the fog was 60% responsible for the accident, while the driver without vehicle lights on is 40% responsible. If the driver who didn’t have his lights on would have recovered $10,000, his recovery would be reduced to $6,000 because of his 40% contributory negligence. Whether the speeding driver would recover anything will depend on state law — in some states the driver who bears over 50% of the responsibility would recover nothing, not the 40% of his damages.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “What is ‘comparative negligence’?”